Wednesday, October 05, 2011

Proposal: How (not) To Gain Acclaim At Someone Else’s Expense

Timed out 6 votes to 4. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 07 Oct 2011 02:15:18 UTC

Add the following text to the end of the rule ‘Everyone’s a Critic’:

Critiques may not be Exhibited.

 

posted by Bucky at 05 Oct 2011 04:59:17 UTC Comments (14)

Comments

omd:

05-10-2011 05:16:24 UTC

against A well-written Critique like the recent one has every right to be exhibited.

Josh: Mastermind he/they

05-10-2011 06:10:45 UTC

for No-one exhibits reviews.

Kevan: he/him

05-10-2011 07:16:46 UTC

for

bateleur:

05-10-2011 08:02:17 UTC

for

Wooble:

05-10-2011 11:15:31 UTC

for

ais523: Mastermind

05-10-2011 18:39:58 UTC

against I think it should be possible to vote critiques as works of art.

Klisz:

05-10-2011 19:36:40 UTC

against

Prince Anduril:

06-10-2011 07:31:42 UTC

against

Prince Anduril:

06-10-2011 07:33:50 UTC

against Means I don’t get Acclaim.

Kevan: he/him

06-10-2011 08:18:07 UTC

[Anduril] You’ve already Exhibited your Critique, so it’s fine - there isn’t any retroactive element to this proposal.

Josh: Mastermind he/they

06-10-2011 09:10:23 UTC

Aside: I think that there should be a reward for well-constructed reviews, but it shouldn’t be Acclaim. Aside from anything else it’s thematically weird.

Prince Anduril:

06-10-2011 16:28:34 UTC

Kevan: True, but I dislike the principle.

Josh: Really? We could add a new field of course, but I think getting acclaim for writing a good critique makes sense.

ais523: Mastermind

06-10-2011 18:04:07 UTC

We should probably use FOR votes for accepting the opinion stated in a critique, and ARROWs for voting the critique itself to be art.

Darknight: he/him

07-10-2011 06:07:08 UTC

imperial