BlogNomic: The Ninth Dynasty of ais523

Is this a stub too far? We should probably plug population and districts in properly before expanding out to other Civ concepts

Title is good though 👍

Well that’s part of why I went for the slow fill-in of resources. Also, if resources are going to be a thing, I’d rather know that before we flesh out population than graft them on after the fact.

If we’re going to have resources being set directly by players, I think I’d rather have the people in a given region have some say in it rather than just having it controlled by whoever happens to be online at the right times.

I do like that we seem to be dedicated to letting the City Architects name the things in their domain: city names, resource names, ….

We should keep that as a recurring part of this dynastic theme.

Alright, how’s that

Did you just vote in favor of your own Proposal? Lol

That said,    from me as well

from me, for now, until we know how the rest of the stuff settles down

I want to vote in favour, but once we factor in the rules that will be needed to connect this to the rest of the ruleset (which also needs expanding), it could get quite unwieldy and we might be better served by a simplified system.

I think I might hold off on voting at the moment though.

It sounds like an interesting idea, it’s racing a bit ahead of everything else that’s been decided so far but I like the concept so, 

Seems premature but I’m not against it

...def has no effect right now, does it?

That’s how I understand it

Primary-secondary structure is fine.

I do not like the freeform resource names; I think it’s too likely to cause problems later.

I too am a bit skeptical of the resource naming, but that’s not exactly a deal breaker. I do also like the primary/secondary. I don’t love how the seeding action is worded. It seems as soon as it’s triggered once it would preclude anyone from trigger it again since “none of them have any non-blank primary resource” would now be false. Also I don’t love that there isn’t a restriction on which regions a city architect can name resources for meaning that I could name a primary resource in a region which does not contain a city I control. Doesn’t seem game breaking just doesn’t feel good. Also I am on the fence about it being too soon for this rule. I could be convinced, but I would like some of the other things addressed before I am onboard.

per Josh. Better to keep things simple till we kickstart