Sunday, February 08, 2009

Proposal: Limit fix

Qourumed with Words in more than half the votes, Arth it’s up to you.
-amnistar

Adminned at 09 Feb 2009 14:39:30 UTC

If more than half of all comments containing counted votes contain the text “Words”, Arthexis shall make a post detailing the exact number of words that appear in the theme.
If more than half of all comments containing counted votes contain the text “Letters”, Arthexis shall make a post detailing the exact number of letters (including spaces) that appear in the theme.
If more than half of all comments containing counted votes contain the text “Words” and the text “Letters”, then Arthexis shall make a post in which he laughs at us for being unable to make up our minds and give us no other information.

posted by Amnistar at 08 Feb 2009 02:07:00 UTC Comments (20)

Comments

Amnistar: he/himIdle

08-02-2009 02:08:40 UTC

Explicit Author for for Words

Sparrow: Idle

08-02-2009 02:10:59 UTC

against Letters

Klisz: Idle

08-02-2009 02:24:29 UTC

for  Words.

Darknight: he/him

08-02-2009 02:48:05 UTC

for Words

Clucky: he/himIdle

08-02-2009 04:01:14 UTC

for Words

arthexis: he/himIdle

08-02-2009 05:16:13 UTC

for Letters

Qwazukee: Idle

08-02-2009 06:05:31 UTC

against Words

Hix: Idle

08-02-2009 06:24:22 UTC

against No way am I going through all Proposals ever written to see how many comments containing counted votes contain certain words.  But I’m sure it wouldn’t be more than half of them.

Gnauga: Idle

08-02-2009 14:40:42 UTC

for It’s implied for votes in this proposal alone. When in doubt, think about what would happen if it was in a CfJ.

Also words and letters

zuff: Idle

08-02-2009 15:01:27 UTC

for Words and Letters

Rodlen: Idle

08-02-2009 16:14:21 UTC

for Words

Kevan: he/himIdle

08-02-2009 16:21:02 UTC

for Words and letters.

Wakukee: Idle

08-02-2009 16:53:49 UTC

Quote by Hix plus a convienient added bold.: ” against No way am I going through all Proposals ever written to see how many comments containing counted votes contain certain <strong>words</words>.  But I’m sure it wouldn’t be more than half of them.”

Wakukee: Idle

08-02-2009 16:54:27 UTC

I mean: ...words.

Wakukee: Idle

08-02-2009 16:54:53 UTC

His vote counts for words.

Amnistar: he/himIdle

08-02-2009 17:26:12 UTC

If that’s the case, then there are several proposals in the that need to be adjusted because they use the same wording.  Precedence is on my side, counted votes applies to this proposal.

Hix: Idle

08-02-2009 19:09:05 UTC

Nonetheless, it is sloppy. 

(Also, I intentionally included “words”)

Igthorn: Idle

08-02-2009 19:09:36 UTC

for Words

Amnistar: he/himIdle

08-02-2009 20:02:05 UTC

agreed, I’ll not use the wording in the future.

ais523: Custodian

09-02-2009 17:15:00 UTC

for words (let’s do it by proposal, it’s a lot less disruptive than the zuff method)