Sunday, June 13, 2010

Proposal: Potions for Everyone!

Vetoed procedurally -Darth

Adminned at 13 Jun 2010 15:58:02 UTC

Add a new Rule to the Ruleset.  Call it “Random Loot”

Certain actions may result in a @ Finding Treasure.  Whenever an @ Finds Treasure, roll DICE3. 
*If the result is a 1, that @ has an Unidentified Potion added to their Inventory.
*If the result is a 2, roll DICEX, where X is one plus the number of items in the list in the Rule “Weapon List”; the corresponding item from that list is added to their Inventory.  If the result is exactly X, roll DICE(X-1) and the corresponding item from that list is added to their Inventory with a +(DICE2) Enhancement.
*If the result is a 3, roll DICEX, where X is one plus the number of items in the list in the Rule “Armor List”; the corresponding item from that list is added to their Inventory.  If the result is exactly X, roll DICE(X-1) and the corresponding item from that list is added to their Inventory with a +(DICE2) Enhancement.

Whenever a proposal by an @ becomes Enacted, its author Finds Treasure.

Add the following text to the Rule entitled “Dungeon”:

Whenever an @ successfully Finds the Stairs, they also Find Treasure.

Unless a majority of EVCs on this Proposal contain the phrase “No Soup”, the author of this proposal Finds Treasure.

Comments

Klisz:

13-06-2010 18:10:24 UTC

against who rolls DICE3? Me or the @ finding the treasure? The latter makes sense gameplay-wise, but the former makes sense thematically.

Bucky:

13-06-2010 18:33:22 UTC

Whoever’s action results in Finding Treasure - here the admin enacting the proposal and the @ himself, respectively.

Anonyman:

13-06-2010 18:46:47 UTC

for

Put:

13-06-2010 20:28:50 UTC

imperial

Klisz:

13-06-2010 20:42:32 UTC

Bucky: The proposal doesn’t make that clear at all.

Hix:

13-06-2010 21:02:52 UTC

against No Soup

Bucky:

13-06-2010 21:10:14 UTC

Procedural veto and repropose then?

Klisz:

13-06-2010 22:57:45 UTC

veto procedural