Saturday, June 24, 2006

Proposal: Reductio Victoria II

Reaches Quorum (9-0)
Enacted by Hix

Adminned at 26 Jun 2006 09:05:29 UTC

[ Reproposing verbatim, as it got a majority - I don’t think Bucky’s objections are strong enough to risk upsetting other voters by rewording anything, and I don’t know what Hix’s were. ]

Reword Law 1.9 (Victory and Ascension) to:-

If a Monk (other than the Abbot) believes that e has achieved victory, e may Make a Post to the Blognomic weblog in the Declaration of Victory category, detailing this.

Upon doing so, the game immediately game goes into Hiatus, if it hasn’t already. During this time, the only game actions that may be taken are those covered by Laws 1.2, 1.6, 1.7 and 1.9.

Every Monk may respond to an active DoV saying whether or not e believes the poster has achieved victory (using the FOR and AGAINST icons).

The Declaration of Victory may be resolved after 24 hours, or after 12 hours if the Abbot has voted on it. Upon resolution, if a Quorum of Monks have voted on the DoV and more than half of those votes were in favour, then the DoV passes - otherwise the DoV fails, and if no other DoVs are still pending, the Hiatus ends.

When a DoV passes, all other active DoVs are failed, and a new Dynasty begins with the Monk who made the DoV as its Abbot. (That Monk may pass this role to another Monk at this point, if they wish.) The Hiatus continues until the new Abbot posts an Ascension Address to the BlogNomic weblog - this shall specify Abbot’s chosen theme for the new round, and may optionally include a proclamation that any number of Rules will be repealed, and that any keywords will be replaced with new theme-appropriate terms.

Comments

Elias IX:

24-06-2006 18:53:05 UTC

for

The Doctor:

24-06-2006 19:21:25 UTC

imperial

As i don’t believe this rule will be of much importance to me as i don’t intend on winning.

Hix:

24-06-2006 20:53:02 UTC

Upon closer examination this time around…  I don’t find that much to object to.  The only thing that really jumps out at me is the use of “The Declaration of Victory may be resolved” as if resolution were optional (who makes this decision, anyway?).  I’d be more inclined to have the DoV automatically pass or fail when certain conditions are met. for

Kevan: he/him

25-06-2006 01:57:34 UTC

I think it’s clearer if it’s manual, to avoid messy situations where people continue to vote on a DoV that’s been invisibly resolved (and a legal win is overturned three days later when we realise the final voter came in at 24:03 hours).

Usually an admin would make the call, but this wording doesn’t preclude a player posting an entry announcing that the DoV has resolved.

Greth:

25-06-2006 04:32:07 UTC

for

Bucky:

25-06-2006 14:37:40 UTC

for I can propose to fix any issues later.

Angry Grasshopper:

26-06-2006 01:53:03 UTC

Well, if you copy and paste your proposal, I’ll just copy and paste my vote:

for

Thelonious:

26-06-2006 10:18:52 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

26-06-2006 15:48:59 UTC

for