Wouldn’t it just be easier to have negitive and positive might?

In some ways, but it’d have more drawbacks, I think. You’d need to have negative/positive City Might and Global Might, and explain that you can use Negative Global Might to pay off Positive City Might but not the other way around.

And an action being described as negatively mighty just sounds a bit weird.

actually, I’m going to change my vote to no, if possible.  Creating a city and then using Vision-Priest-Inspire, it seems you could fill the rest of the world with as many temples you want.  Also, Mob seems to be useless.

Vision-Priest-Inspire means that you get a free Temple when you buy a new City; you still have to spend 1 Quint to create a City. (And Vision means that you can only use the Power to create a Temple in an empty City - have I worded that too vaguely?)

Mob-Priest-Holy-Day-Smite seems quite good, as a use for Mob (and I hadn’t designed this, “3” just seemed a good number). And players will be free to propose lots of tinkery little additions to this list, of course - it’s generally a nice thing in Nomic to have lots of small, weak tools lying around, for people to build interestingly elaborate machines out of.

The last paragraph of this proposal gives voters a veto-clause, anyway, if you’d rather vote FOR this proposal but without a couple of the power-components.

It must have just been worded to vaguely.  I was imagining V-I-P allowing you to create an empty city, then from that empty city, creating temples left and right in other (as stated by any) cities.  I’ll vote yes if the wording of this proposal gets much more clear.

Rule 1.7 says that Proposals can’t be altered once people have started voting on them (that an evil proposer could change a proposal to read “I propose that I win”), but we can amend this later if people think we need to.

I think it’s fairly indisputable that “Create one Temple to any Deity in any City.” and “Power can only be used in an empty City.” add up to “Create one Temple to any Deity in an empty City.”, though, that the only things that are “in Cities” are Temples - that anyone wilfully misinterpreting this would be knocked back with a quick Call for Judgment.

Would you give an example created power? I’m not sure I understand the Worship/Power balance. Why does fire give less worship if it also costs a temple to use?

heh.  the things in section one are now ‘laws’ 1-10 and the other things are ‘rules’.  no need for a 1. or a 2.  (at least, that was the intent).

I don’t really understand what’s going on anymore..

And lance: you can change your vote as often as you like.  We only count the most recent one.

[Smith] Making “Fire” generate 10 Worship would mean that you could use a simple Fire-Inspire power to move Temples around at will. It seemed slightly more interesting to dent the resale value on a Temple.

An example Power might be Beltane (Priest-Festival-Inspire) for a total of 10 Worship and 10 Might, which adds up to “Power can only be used in a City of your Pantheon. Power can only be used occasionally. Create one Temple to any Deity in any City.”. This would mean that you could create a free Temple in a City belonging your Pantheon, once per day.

Sorry, once per day, if it’s “occasionally”. Still not sure I like that jargon.

Week!

I like the idea. How are Might and Worship defined? Are they defined yet?

Aha, I think I’ve got it.