Would have been nicer to format it as the three old rules becoming sub-rules of the Stats rule, and having the Stats rule state any shared properties of all the rules (if any).

CoV: 

This will break my proposal, http://blognomic.com/archive/enemy_combatants_seem_oddly_like_us/ , as it creates a sub-rule called ‘Health’ (which your proposal would remove and append to a new rule!) - although it may partially hold together, it wouldn’t be pretty…

Although, will my proposal’s rule creation break, as it creates a rule with the same name as another rule? Ugggh…

Complicated.

CoV again. It’s probably safe to rule only Rule 2.3 Health is repealed and appended, because it will be chronologically the first and you didn’t say ‘all rules titled Health’, only ‘the rule Health’. But I’ll try to remember to create unique rule titles in future, and this could have also been avoided by using the Rule’s entire number, 2.3.

Also, the Proposal says ‘Rule’, not ‘Sub-rule’.

Sparrow:  Subrules are rules, so the problem still exists.

, but I’ll CoV if Devenger’s proposal fails.

Devenger’s proposal will now have no effect, due to its “If the proposal titled ‘Know Thy Enemy’ failed, this proposal does nothing.” clause.

S/Ked my proposal that would cause the issue, so consider recasting your votes guys (this looks like a handy proposal to me at least)

CoV