Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Proposal: Too many cooks in the kitchen

Reached Underdog quorum 6-3. Enacted by card.

Adminned at 21 Apr 2017 06:16:28 UTC

Remove the following from the rule “Performance Enhancing Drugs (PED)”:

Managers can spend a certain amount of PEDs on a Blogger for a certain Match if they privately communicate to the Commissioner this fact beforehand and remove that amount of PEDs from their inventory. Then, for that match, the Commissioner privately rolls a 1d10 per each PED used, and applies one of the following results according to the result rolled:

  1: The Blogger dies, and is removed from the game permanently
  2,3 or 4: Nothing happens.
  5, 6, 7, 8 or 9: Double the Blogger’s level and stats for that match
  10: Triple the Blogger’s stats for the match, but immediately after the match, the Blogger’s stats and level are all set to a value of 1.

We don’t need two different ways to use PEDs, particularly when one of them can’t be used since we can’t accurately predict when pokes is going to choose to oversee a game.  Admins note, I’m still an underdog.


Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:

04-20-2017 00:31:32 UTC



04-20-2017 00:37:35 UTC

against I prefer the other version


04-20-2017 00:38:33 UTC

for I do like getting the cops to bust Managers and I’m glad that’s kept in.

Oracular rufio:

04-20-2017 03:24:36 UTC

Yeah, I figured there was no reason to take that out, although it will be better when coupled with a penalty for drugged players.


04-20-2017 15:10:55 UTC

against Shrug, I like my version. But the other is cool too.


04-20-2017 17:24:09 UTC

against I’d like PEDs to be confusing.

Oracular rufio:

04-20-2017 19:04:14 UTC

Arthrxis, this isn’t any more or less confusing than the other implementation, it’s just redundant.


04-21-2017 01:19:47 UTC



04-21-2017 06:15:23 UTC