No one would drive unless they can be sure to drive it again before anyone else. Thus it is worse than a downtown if lots more than one perspn has it.

Sorry for the poor spelling above. I sent from phone.

Maybe the Open/Closed switch should work nonregarding to the Route being Driven or Avoided?
Afterall, if Avoiding a Route means not taking customers on this Route, then it has nothing to do with the state of the Level Crossing.

Because its still broken. You don’t “otherwise specify” that the effects of a Railway Crossing route should apply even if the route is inactive, just that “Level Crossing is Open”. So if the level crossing is closed, its impossible to reopen it.

Furthermoreso, there needs to be an easy way to track the status of the level crossing.

Futherermoreersoer, I don’t think the risk/reward is enough. It still only averages out to 1 cash per ride, and chances are if you go through someone else is going to close it behind you.

In addition to other comments, proposals that add new pieces of gamestate but don’t specify how they’re tracked are frowned on. (They still work, but it becomes pretty annoying to play, so tends to be voted town, if you add some relevant piece of gamestate that can’t easily be tracked in the GNDT and isn’t specified as tracked some other way.)

I assumed the GNDT was suppose to track the gamestate, and it needn’t be precised in the rules…
I guess I’ll repropose then.
Clucky: If Level Crossing is open, the route is considered Active, so I don’t see what’s the problem? The “otherwise specify” bit is only about the effect “switching from Closed to Open” which wouldn’t be applied without the rephrasing.

Right, but if the level crossing is closed then the route is inactive so the effect doesn’t triggers and can never trigger because as long as the level crossing is closed the route is inactive and inactive routes don’t trigger.

Oh I see what you mean now.