Ah. My other proposal bugged out apparently lol.

I think it works mechanically better for automatic gamestate changes to instead explicitly require having a person do the changing.

Ok I agree, I’ll kill this so I can revive my other proposal :P

(:VETO: is only meaningful from the Master; would be a self-kill.)

oh huh, the big NOT button makes a and not an

ok I’m digging an even bigger well of confusion here, the big NOT symbol is indeed VETO and the deferential is IMPERIAL, but the VETO before didn’t turn into it because of the ( hanging out by it, I guess.

Ok thanks

Another question before I make another mistake: once this proposal is failed by an admin, can I repost the proposal that was rendered illegal because of the 2 pending proposals rule, or do I have to wait a day (because technically I posted 3 proposals which is the daily limit). ?

I’d interpret the third one you posted as “not a proposal” since it didn’t meet the criteria (not having 2 active) to be one. That would make the reposted one okay since you’ve only posted 2 actual proposals. I also don’t think that would run afoul of the spirit of the limit. Someone could always CfJ if they think it’s not okay, but I’d bet nobody would, and if they did it wouldn’t successfully make your repost illegal.

Even if not, the next Blognomic day is only 45 minutes away.

Ah, I also accidentally adminned this early (and then unadminned it) - the proposal before it in the queue needs to pass or fail first, before this one can be failed.