Friday, January 03, 2020

Call for Judgment: clean slate [Victory]

Reached quorum 3 votes to 1. Enacted by Kevan. Cuddlebeam achieves victory. (Pokes hadn’t commented since mid-December, Josh is idle.)

Adminned at 03 Jan 2020 09:09:30 UTC

Randomly select an unidle player that has also made a comment or post on the blog within 72 hours of the enactment of this CfJ, from the following list of player names: card, Cuddlebeam, Josh, Kevan, pokes and The Duke of Waltham.

The selected player has achieved victory.

how about something a little more fair that doesn’t restrict victory to admins.

posted by card at 03 Jan 2020 04:12:00 UTC Comments (7)

Comments

Madrid:

03-01-2020 06:41:45 UTC

for

TyGuy6:

03-01-2020 08:18:37 UTC

I guess a CfJ can create untracked gamestate, huh? It’s not an orphan variable, though it kind of seemed like one.

TyGuy6:

03-01-2020 08:18:51 UTC

for

Madrid:

03-01-2020 08:31:12 UTC

I think Proposals themselves are already tracked entities, the tracking medium being the Blognomic page and archives.

Its not explicit, though. But I find it similar to how the Ruleset is tracked on the Ruleset wiki page and not Orphan’d somehow.

Madrid:

03-01-2020 08:34:44 UTC

(And dice rolls are tracked on the dice roller thinger)

Kevan: City he/him

03-01-2020 09:02:44 UTC

And that’s quorum.

against personally, though, as this carries forward (even if only in the short term) the idea that turning up is just as valid an approach as trying to play the game, which isn’t healthy when a dynasty is wavering.

Madrid:

03-01-2020 09:10:08 UTC

Personally I don’t care who wins and just want to get this over with instead of more bureaucracy.

But, if it helps, I’ll transfer Emperor to you if I win it.