BlogNomic: The Ninth Dynasty of ais523

as this doesn’t solve the Faux Pas.

Wait, yes it does, due to the gamestate reset clause. Missed that. 

I might have voted differntly on some proposals had this been the case from the start. I believe we need to vote again on all proposals since the ‘work of art’ proposal passed.

  cov just to get the game going again. But i stand by my point

Erm… it has been the case from the start. This proposal is just removing the doubt cast on the validity of proposals by ais523’s observations.

Unless you’re perhaps trying to claim you spotted that whole issue before ais523 did and elected to say nothing?

Bateleur i am not saying i did. Im a believer of the idea that if you change one little thing everything else changes. So if i read the new line in the first place and not the old line i might have won the lottery last night.

wait no this is still borken

[coppro] Care to explain why?

cov

If you’re collaborating on somebody’s scam that needs this fix delayed, then fair enough, but if there’s a reason why people think this doesn’t fix the problems that are stopping us playing the game right now, it’d be good to know what they think is missing, so that we can address it.

CoV to I guess.

My reason for voting differently before was because I feel that we should have something along the lines of “Work of Art isn’t a post category”.

Then we don’t have any of the problems, but still get to vote good proposals up to give acclaim. It seems a shame to remove that aspect of the game without a good reason. It may be that this will still leave us in an illegal gamestate for reasons I can’t quite see yet though, in which case, I think this is the best alternative solution.

Fair point, and I’ll be happy to propose such an amendment if this passes and lets us get back to actually making proposals. “Being able to make proposals but not being able to arrow them” seems a step up from “not being able to make proposals”, at least.

Your DEFERENTIAL vote is ignored (and you’re still counted as voting against), by the way - you can only cast a vote of DEF “if the Votable Matter is a Proposal”, so this isn’t a way to abstain on CfJs.

...and in any case, since I am the Critic and have already voted for, changing it to a For vote will have the desired effect. :-)

Of right.    then

again because enacting this would retroactively make ais’ scam succeed, and leave us in a worse state than at present.

per coppro

just in case, although Kevan and comex have convinced me that it wouldn’t.

CoV then