Monday, November 01, 2021

Proposal: Get your skates on, mate

Timed out and enacted, 5-3. Josh

Adminned at 03 Nov 2021 14:54:13 UTC

If Proposal: Inching Closer To A Victory Condition was not enacted then this proposal does nothing.

In the rule Open House, after the bullet point that starts “The Realtor conducting this Open House may (but does not have to) select a single Offer to accept”, add the following as a new bullet point:

* If an Offer was accepted, then the Realtor holding the Open House adjusts their RP as follows: If the Offer was greater than the amount of Bucks the Realtor spent at Auction to become the Property’s Seller then they gain the difference between the two figures in RP; otherwise they gain 1 RP, unless the Offer was three or more Bucks less than the amount of Bucks the Realtor spent at Auction to become the Property’s Seller, in which case they lose 1 RP.

In the rule Realtor Points, change “which defaults to 0” to “which can be negative and defaults to 0”.

Comments

Silverwing: she/her

01-11-2021 17:58:18 UTC

When you say “If the Offer was greater than the amount of Bucks the Realtor spent at Auction to become the Property’s Seller then they gain the difference between the two figures in RP” I think you should replace it with If the Offer was greater than the amount of Bucks the Realtor spent at Auction to become the Property’s Seller then they gain the difference between the two figures plus one in RP.

Silverwing: she/her

01-11-2021 18:01:27 UTC

Otherwise, if it was profitable by one, you would get no more RP than if it was not profitable.

TyGuy6:

01-11-2021 18:29:51 UTC

Sorry, but I don’t much care to lose 1 RP for a house I’ve already bought above market value. I think it’s the same for everyone who has bought a house.

You could say, just don’t sell it, but then I’d say, then why even put the -1 RP clause in there? Feels like I’m going to start paying property taxes or something. against

Brendan: he/him

01-11-2021 18:34:36 UTC

for

Chiiika: she/her

01-11-2021 18:44:43 UTC

against

Chiiika: she/her

01-11-2021 18:45:27 UTC

tracking nightmare, and now half quorum has done this

Silverwing: she/her

01-11-2021 19:02:53 UTC

for

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

01-11-2021 19:15:59 UTC

I really wish there wasn’t an RP loss here.

Josh: Observer he/they

01-11-2021 20:54:20 UTC

@Trapdoorspyder I’d vote DEF on a proposal to strip that out, or increase the threshold at which it kicks in.

I don’t think that selling a property at a huge loss should get you VPs, though. That makes no sense to me.

Raven1207: he/they

02-11-2021 13:04:46 UTC

for

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

03-11-2021 01:29:51 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

03-11-2021 13:24:34 UTC

against