Proposal: Making the Machine work
Quorum Reached: 6 v 2.
—Seebo
Adminned at 01 May 2007 18:20:26 UTC
If there is no rule called “The Machine”, then this proposal has no further effect.
Create a new sub-rule of “The Machine” called “The Machine in action” with text:
At any given time, the Machine is considered to be either “Running” or “Standing by”. At the moment this paragraph is added to the Ruleset, the Machine is Standing by.
When the Machine is Standing by, it becomes Running if any of the following occur:
*The order or contents of the list of Parts on the “Machine Parts” page or of the list of Variables on the “Machine Variables” page change (including the addition or removal of a Part or Variable).
*A Worker is added to or removed from the list of Active Workers in the blog sidebar.
*A Proposal becomes Enacted. In this case, the specified effects of said Proposal occur before the Machine becomes Running.
*A value which the Ruleset requires to be tracked in the GNDT changes.When the Machine becomes Running, the following steps take place, in order:
*Step 1 - If any Rule other than this Rule requires changes to be made to the Gamestate, those changes are made as usual, until no such changes are required. (If there is an infinite loop within the Ruleset itself, no out will be provided, of course. Don’t let that happen.)
*Step 2 - If the order and contents of the list of Variables on the “Machine Variables” page are identical to what they were during any previous iteration of Step 2 that was made since the Machine was most recently Standing by, then the Machine becomes Standing by, and any remaining steps are not performed. (This is the clause that allows us to break out of infinite loops. Note that the break-out always occurs immediately after we’ve checked that the Ruleset itself will not throw us back into the loop)
*Step 3 - If no requirements for the Initiator of any Part are satisfied, then the Machine becomes Standing by, and any remaining steps are not performed.
*Step 4 - Changes to the “Machine Variables” page are made as described in the Effect of the first Part for which the Initiator requirements are satisfied (when the Parts are considered in the order in which they are listed on the “Machine Parts” page). No aspect of the Gamestate other than the contents of the “Machine Variables” page may be changed in this way.
*Step 5 - Repeat Steps 1-5 in order, until a Step indicates that remaining steps are not to be performed.
And once I get Positions worked out, we’ll be 1 step closer to gettin’ the machine running :). Last requirement is mentioning what the specifications the customer wants are :)
I am changing my vote because I think we should either come up with a process for dealing with infinite states that don’t repeat, or we should change the definition of Pieces so that they cannot occur. 
Enderbean: