Monday, August 21, 2006

MOT + NE

March of time.  (now at 1880/6/8)  No requirements.

Proof that all requirements for march of time have been satisfied.

(feel free to skip.. boring quantifier stuff)

There exists no X such that X is an element of the empty set. [Empty sets have no elements.]
The requirements for march of time is the empty set. [March of time has no requirements.]
There exists no X such that X is an element of the requirements for march of time.  [...]
There exists no X, where X is a requirement for march of time.  [...]
For all X, X is not a requirement for march of time. [Therefore, for any given requirement, it is not a requirement for march of time.]
For all X, either X is not a requirement for march of time, or X has been satisfied. [...]
For all X, if X is a requirement for march of time, X has been satisfied. [p->q equiv to (NOT p) or q]
For all X, where X is a requirement for march of time, X has been satisfied. [...]
[All requirements for march of time have been satisfied.]
QED

Followed by new node event at new location (Epylar thinks about Italy momentarily while eating dinner.)

 

 

Comments

Kevan: he/him

21-08-2006 03:40:46 UTC

Um, the ruleset no longer requires you to explain how requirements were satisfied. But it does require you to post the date and description of new Node Events.

Kevan: he/him

21-08-2006 03:41:20 UTC

Oh, that was the description.

aran:

21-08-2006 10:10:38 UTC

it also requires posting the keywords.

from the rules: “and then posting an entry to the weblog that includes the dates and the new descriptions (including keywords) of all affected Events.”. amen.

epylar:

21-08-2006 16:20:05 UTC

The keywords are Epylar and Italy.  They were included in the description.

epylar:

21-08-2006 16:20:39 UTC

(I know, it means put them in brackets.. I forgot.  It’s fine if that invalidates it.  The proof, by the way, was just for fun..)