Friday, June 09, 2023

Call for Judgment: No Boosters

Timed out and enacted, 4-2. Josh

Adminned at 11 Jun 2023 21:16:31 UTC

In the rule Levels of Reality, change “Whenever a Mindjacker Ascends their Level increases by 1, and when they Descend their Level decreases by 1” to:

Ascending is an Existential Action that entails increasing the actor’s Level by 1; Descending entails descreasing the actor’s Level by 1. A Mindjacker may only Ascend or Descend when permitted by other clauses in the Ruleset.

In the rule Memes change “may Ascend to that Tier, as if they met the Ascension Criteria of every intervening Tier” to:

may set their Level to the same number as the Tier of that Meme

If any Mindjacker has Ascended in a way that was not compliant with the wording of the ruleset following the enactment of the above clauses in this proposal between the time when it was posted and the time when it was enacted, revert that Ascension and any Tier Actions taken by that Mindjacker that relied upon the higher Level being true.

I’ll leave the question of whether to acknowledge Bucky’s and JonathanDark’s gamestate as valid as an exercise to the current players.

Comments

Bucky:

09-06-2023 21:27:22 UTC

Is this supposed to also define Descending as an Existential Action? Because it currently doesn’t.

Josh: Observer he/they

09-06-2023 21:36:12 UTC

I personally don’t mind players Descending at will when otherwise permitted; that’s consistent with the current ruleset as well, I think

lemon: she/her

09-06-2023 21:56:29 UTC

for seems fair to me!

JonathanDark: he/him

09-06-2023 22:30:19 UTC

for

Bucky:

09-06-2023 22:53:49 UTC

against For the third time this dynasty, this actually breaks as much as it solves, I expect it to pass anyway over my protest so I’m not disclosing the scam, and I expect Josh to be unhappy when I actually perform it.

lemon: she/her

09-06-2023 23:00:16 UTC

@Bucky come on now, clue us in and we can take another shot at this proposal. i’m inclined to change my vote if you actually share what the problem is. is it something about ascending freely via triggers?

Bucky:

09-06-2023 23:03:39 UTC

Yes, ascending freely via triggers is an example of the problem.

JonathanDark: he/him

09-06-2023 23:07:43 UTC

CoV against Alrighty then, let’s go back to the drawing board

Josh: Observer he/they

09-06-2023 23:16:44 UTC

I won’t change my vote without knowing what the issue is, as otherwise we’ll still have no way of fixing it.

lemon: she/her

09-06-2023 23:21:42 UTC

@Josh i explained what i think Bucky’s problem is on the discord.

@Bucky i’m skeptical, but sure. i’ll change my vote if you make another CfJ that’s exactly like this one but with the broken phrase replaced with a fix that’s to your liking.

Raven1207: he/they

11-06-2023 01:15:56 UTC

against

redtara: they/them

11-06-2023 20:21:13 UTC

for

JonathanDark: he/him

11-06-2023 20:23:58 UTC

CoV for