Thursday, April 17, 2008

Proposal: Not [Evil]

Vetoed.
-Ornithopter

Adminned at 19 Apr 2008 09:17:19 UTC

This proposal shall have, in opposite, ten times the effect it normally would.

Comments

jay:

17-04-2008 04:30:31 UTC

Gah, I was trying to edit this pre-vote and wound up making dupes. Could an admin please remove my previous two posts titled ‘remove’?

arthexis: he/him

17-04-2008 05:24:35 UTC

for
This proposal has no effect. Even if a rule causes something to happen when a proposal passes, that is not an effect of the proposal itself.

jay:

17-04-2008 05:45:09 UTC

imperial That depends on what your definition of “is” is.

dogfish:

17-04-2008 10:12:55 UTC

is this allowed??

Yoda:

17-04-2008 12:31:04 UTC

against

Yoda:

17-04-2008 12:33:04 UTC

I just made the dupe proposals into story posts; unfortunately, there is no way to delete posts entirely.

aaronwinborn:

17-04-2008 12:57:04 UTC

against i don’t even know what this is attempting to achieve, so i’d definitely have to say it’s evil and underhanded…

Josh: Observer he/they

17-04-2008 14:31:00 UTC

against Also, can Jay vote DEF on his own proposal? If Purplebeard now votes against, does that count as a self-kill?

jay:

17-04-2008 14:49:03 UTC

You can’t act on a proposal after a veto, so my self-kill a fraction of a second later wouldn’t trigger.

Josh: Observer he/they

17-04-2008 14:53:11 UTC

Purplebeard’s against isn’t necessarily a veto.

jay:

17-04-2008 15:38:14 UTC

for True. Changing my vote per rule 1.4.

Kevan: he/him

17-04-2008 16:26:04 UTC

against

Yoda:

17-04-2008 17:23:07 UTC

Since you can’t change a s/k vote, if PB votes against this, would it be considered s/k anyway?

jay:

17-04-2008 17:39:27 UTC

It isn’t a self-kill yet, and it’s not a DEF now. The Overlord’s decision no longer matters in that meta-way. Unless he wants it to.

Soyweiser:

17-04-2008 19:44:38 UTC

against

Ornithopter:

17-04-2008 21:38:07 UTC

against

dogfish:

17-04-2008 22:21:06 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

17-04-2008 23:16:15 UTC

against i think this dynasty is getting very confused lol

Beane:

18-04-2008 02:39:43 UTC

against

Purplebeard:

18-04-2008 16:43:57 UTC

veto

jay:

18-04-2008 17:28:50 UTC

RLY?

Soyweiser:

19-04-2008 14:53:45 UTC

YA RLY!

Why didn’t you write your proposal to just give you 11 GL?

(And on a related note, if you look at purplebeards veto’ing history you could have know that he would veto this).