Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Proposal: thanksgiving leftovers

illegal due to me using the word nature in the proposal - card

Adminned at 23 Nov 2017 07:20:09 UTC

Under Synonyms add the text

An X Tesser, where X is a valid affinity, means a Tesserer of that affinity.

Add to Affinities

Water and Fire are opposites. Void and Nature are opposites.

Add to Spells

Y stands for a shard that is the same affinity as the performer. P stands for a shard that is the opposite affinity of the performer. O stands for a shard that is the same affinity as the Tesseract’s current position.

Add to the list of Spells

[A] Ashes to Ashes: Gain 2 power.
[Y] Trade: A Tesserer other than yourself gains a shard of your affinity. Gain 1 power.
[P] Negate: Choose a Tesser other than yourself. If they have a shard of your affinity they lose it and gain a shard of their affinity and you gain a shard of your affinity.
[O] Gamble: You must wait until the Tesseract’s orientation changes before casting this spell again. Roll a DICE2, on a 1 gain a shard of the Tesseract’s orientation after it changes.

I tried to use most of the new terms which can be a problem in some dynasties.

Comments

Madrid:

23-11-2017 04:56:45 UTC

for

Madrid:

23-11-2017 04:58:01 UTC

Oh wait: Nature: A Nature Tesser cannot make proposals with the word “Nature” in it.

This is an illegal proposal.

card:

23-11-2017 05:37:51 UTC

Tesserers can legally make proposals with their alignment with them, however, they have stricter requirements. They may pass only if the number of votes against equals zero.
Meaning that if this gets one against vote it will fail.

Madrid:

23-11-2017 07:03:18 UTC

I think this would apply, because they’re both contradictory parts (you both can’t make proposals with X and you can make proposals with X) 4) If two parts with the same scope contradict each other, the negative rule applies. (e.g. with “Tesserers may Punch a Spaceman on Friday” and “Tesserers may not Punch Spacemen on Friday”, then Tesserers may not Punch Spacemen on Friday.)

card:

23-11-2017 07:19:16 UTC

I saw that but the wording of the Grynk’s rule made it not as obvious to me, darn.