Saturday, September 02, 2017

Proposal: UN Return Dues [UN Resolution]

Enacted by derrick 7 to 0.

Median Value is 13.

Numeric votes were:
Cuddlebeam: [0]
derrick: [0]
pokes: [4]
card: [13]
kevan: [20]
Sesquipedalian:[20]
Thunder: [20]

Adminned at 02 Sep 2017 23:00:07 UTC

For the purposes of enacting this proposal, a valid numerical vote of value X is a string of the form “[X]”, where X is an integer between 0 and 20. A CIC’s numerical vote on this proposal is the value of the last valid numerical vote they have posted as a comment on this proposal.

Reduce Cuddlebeam’s IE by the median of all CICs’ numerical votes on this proposal, excluding CICs that have no numerical votes on the proposal from this calculation. If necessary, round down.

An experiment in crowd-sourcing the right penalty for skipping the last few ticks.

Comments

pokes:

02-09-2017 11:36:20 UTC

[4]

derrick: he/him

02-09-2017 11:42:42 UTC

for lets make sure this passes

[20]

trying to get around the proposal already so close to quorum is a valid move, but not one I want to encourage. Sorry Cuddles.

pokes:

02-09-2017 11:58:52 UTC

Since you want to make sure this passes: putting down 20 might swing people toward against if they feel such a high number would be overly harsh.

pokes:

02-09-2017 12:03:55 UTC

I see now “round down” is ambiguous; round down the IE, or the reduction? Admin’s choice, I guess. I meant round down the reduction, but maybe we won’t have to disambiguate.

Cuddlebeam:

02-09-2017 14:30:18 UTC

I don’t see why I’d need a penalty if, regardless of personal circumstances, idling is a mechanic available to anyone anyway.

I didn’t do anything special.

Sesquipedalian:

02-09-2017 15:18:17 UTC

for
[20]

Thunder: he/him

02-09-2017 16:54:24 UTC

for
[20]

pokes:

02-09-2017 17:16:54 UTC

pokes:

02-09-2017 17:21:15 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

02-09-2017 20:52:34 UTC

for [20]

derrick: he/him

02-09-2017 21:22:05 UTC

Changing my adjustment to [0]

Cuddlebeam:

02-09-2017 21:43:34 UTC

[0] imperial

Cuddlebeam:

02-09-2017 22:04:31 UTC

@pokes & swords: Tbh I’m not surprised. It’s precisely because of things like this that I wanted to keep points secret, it’s just how nomic goes.

card:

02-09-2017 22:48:05 UTC

[13]  for