Saturday, June 19, 2010

Proposal: You Feel an Urge to Return to the Surface

Fails with Quorum against (2-9) -Bucky

Adminned at 20 Jun 2010 12:44:09 UTC

If an @ mentions the name of one (and only one) active @ in the same comment as their own vote on this proposal, this is regarded as a Nomination of the named @. If an @ is Nominated in the more EVCs than each other @ when this proposal enacts, that @ is known as the Ascendant.

If there is an Ascendant, enact a new Rule, “The Amulet of Yendor”:-

The @ named [XXX] has achieved victory.

...where [XXX] is replaced with the name of the Ascendant.

Unidling to propose this, then idling again.

Eight players are due to idle out through inactivity this weekend, the proposal queue is small and hasn’t been processed for six days, and nothing seems to be happening in terms of gameplay. Darth brought us here with a this-is-going-nowhere-let’s-vote-for-a-winner proposal three weeks into the last dynasty, so maybe it’s time to go out the same way, and start a new round.

Comments

Bucky:

19-06-2010 16:15:56 UTC

against

Kevan: City he/him

19-06-2010 16:23:22 UTC

I was going to propose something based on score-so-far, but skimming the ruleset I couldn’t see any variables that were an obvious and fair reflection of player skill. Two players are ahead in kills, and three are wounded, but that all seems more luck than judgment.

lilomar:

19-06-2010 16:27:18 UTC

against
I have been gone for a week and just returned, but I don’t think we are quite ready to give up on this one.

Hix:

19-06-2010 16:48:50 UTC

imperial

Kyre:

19-06-2010 17:39:37 UTC

imperial

scshunt:

19-06-2010 19:28:45 UTC

for

Klisz:

19-06-2010 21:29:19 UTC

imperial I don’t really think this needs doing, but as the RNG, I’m biased to keep my own dynasty.

Klisz:

19-06-2010 22:51:17 UTC

CoV against as I see there are two DEFs already, and I don’t like it when the emperor abstains when there are multiple DEFs already on the field.

Darknight: he/him

20-06-2010 00:55:47 UTC

against Give it afew more days

Galdyn:

20-06-2010 12:50:45 UTC

against seems to be picking up speed.

Anonyman:

20-06-2010 13:01:00 UTC

against
This dynasty looks like having real potential. I don’t want to see a fast end to it.

Klisz:

20-06-2010 16:28:12 UTC

You know, I think I solved most of the problem by adding the goblin encounter.

Narya:

20-06-2010 17:44:25 UTC

against