Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Proposal: Discouraging Spam.

Hits a Quorum of AGAINST votes and cannot be enacted without CoV. -Bucky

Adminned at 08 Oct 2009 12:39:19 UTC

If points are defined by the ruleset, then add a new rule, “Milestones”:

If players reach any of the below scores, then they have reached the corresponding milestone:
1 - First Point
10 - I’m a Big Boy
25 - Bubblegum
50 - Rareish Coin
100 - I’m Old
123 -  I Beat Jeanne Calment
256 - To the Eighth
747 - Big Plane
1000 - I’m Rich
9001 - What 9000?

Comments

Klisz:

10-08-2009 00:14:49 UTC

for

Bucky:

10-08-2009 00:15:55 UTC

for

Ienpw III:

10-08-2009 00:19:54 UTC

Note that the title and text are unrelated.

arthexis:

10-08-2009 00:54:45 UTC

against

arthexis:

10-08-2009 01:03:32 UTC

More explanation: if this passes, the metadynasty will start going down the drain immediately. Haven’t you guys figured out that this kind of proposals that serve no purpose without adding any gaming factor is what kills dynasties?

Qwazukee:

10-08-2009 01:23:51 UTC

for 9001 should be “Over 9000.”

Ienpw III:

10-08-2009 01:48:20 UTC

Over 9000!!!
What 9000!
That’s the dialogue. I was hoping for a more subtle joke, but there you go.

Ienpw III:

10-08-2009 01:53:04 UTC

Arth: It’s intended to be a more interesting way to refer to certain points values, not anything else.

Qwazukee:

10-08-2009 02:01:09 UTC

Lol subtlety is lost to Blognomic.

Darknight:

10-08-2009 03:11:16 UTC

imperial

arthexis:

10-08-2009 03:41:39 UTC

@yuri: If you first made a rule to tell mw why those point values are important, I might agree to having them named. In the end only 1 milestone ever matters (the last one)

Excalabur:

10-08-2009 04:14:57 UTC

against

Kevan:

10-08-2009 10:13:39 UTC

for

Josh:

10-08-2009 11:41:28 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

10-08-2009 12:53:00 UTC

against

ais523:

10-08-2009 13:07:16 UTC

imperial (explicit abstain)

Klisz:

10-08-2009 14:07:16 UTC

CoV against

Wooble:

10-08-2009 14:51:45 UTC

against

arthexis:

10-08-2009 15:30:37 UTC

By the way, this proposal has no effect: The ruleset does not define points (it only says players have them, whatever they are).

Oze:

10-08-2009 15:30:40 UTC

against

Shem:

10-08-2009 17:11:56 UTC

arth: what exactly woulld a definition be?

for because it’s harmless and could be built upon

Amnistar:

10-08-2009 17:22:22 UTC

against

Kevan:

10-08-2009 18:43:54 UTC

against CoV to speed the queue.

Bucky:

10-08-2009 19:37:48 UTC

CoV,  against  for queue-clearing