Proposal: Sharper Points
Reached quorum with 14 votes FOR. Enacted by Kevan. +10 points to Kevan.
Adminned at 11 Oct 2009 05:05:44 UTC
In Rule 2.1 (Points), replace “gains” with “is awarded” and “loses” with “is fined”.
Reword Rule 2.1.2 (Accountability) to:-
Whenever the enaction or failure of a Proposal would fine or award Points to a Player, the Admin who enacted or failed it must list these fines and awards in their Admin comment.
Within 72 hours of a Player being fined or awarded Points, any Player may process that fine or award in the GNDT (adding Points in the result of an award, removing them in the result of a fine), provided that the adjustment is carried out only once. Points lost to a fine are simply lost, they are not paid to another Player. This rule supersedes every other rule that specifies who can modify a Player’s Score.
If the proposal “Smashing other nomics’ rulesets to pieces” passed, replace “gains” with “is awarded” throughout the rule “Ruleset Theft”.
If the proposal “That went down well” passed, replace “they would gain” with “they would be awarded” in Rule 2.1.
If the proposal “Same issue as Round One” passed, replace “does not gain or lose any Points” with “is not awarded or fined any Points” in the rule “Trivial Proposals”.
Clearing up the currently hazy “gain ten points for a successful proposal, which you may or may not update in the GNDT” mechanism by making it into a clear “you are awarded these points, you may or may not choose to actually claim them”. And adding a 72 hour limit on claiming points, to stop someone from claiming 400 backdated points at the end of the game.
I would like it very much, except for the 72 hours window. I don’t believe we need it.
@arthexis: I’m the sort of person who’d exploit the 72 hours window if it wasn’t there.
Shem: