Monday, March 11, 2024

Proposal: Up the contrast slightly… and maybe shift the hue a bit more red

Popular, 3-0 with 2 DEFs and Observer voting FOR. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 12 Mar 2024 15:52:58 UTC

Add the following to the second paragraph of the rule “Shots”:

A typographical error does not prevent the Shot from being Authentic, as long as it’s obvious what the intended word is.

Add a subrule to the rule “Scoring” named “Editing Disclaimer,” which reads:

Any new post that contains a Shot must include a description of any edits or changes made to the photograph prior to it being made a Shot, with a lack of such a description indicating that no editing was done. If a post is found to have broken this rule, the Seeker responsible or any Admin should replace the Shot in the offending post with this image, no scoring may be performed for that post (and any scoring already awarded to the poster should be reverted), and the responsible Seeker may create a new post as if they had not made the offending post.

Don’t want to ban editing, since I want to try my hand at it this Dynasty, but it should probably be tracked. Also, typos shouldn’t make posts invalid imo


Josh: he/they

11-03-2024 07:58:56 UTC

for We may want to put some reasonable limits on what edits are valid though

JonathanDark: he/him

11-03-2024 17:12:08 UTC


Kevan: City he/him

12-03-2024 12:03:31 UTC

imperial I don’t understand what kind of “editing” is being suggested here.

Josh: he/they

12-03-2024 12:22:25 UTC

Kate Middleton-esque, I suppose. But I would like to be more concrete about what is valid and what isn’t.


12-03-2024 13:51:04 UTC