Friday, December 19, 2008

Clarification

Does the text “no one may VETO a Proposal” in rule 1.8.1 “Metadynasties” override the text “may only veto his own proposals and proposals that have been self-killed” in rule 2.1?

Comments

Yoda:

19-12-2008 14:55:46 UTC

Also, isn’t this technically considered the Fourth Metadynasty, not the First Metadynasty of Rodlen (since that was just the name of the rule)?

Klisz:

19-12-2008 15:22:31 UTC

Yoda! Stop whining.

Klisz:

19-12-2008 15:22:46 UTC

In all seriousness, 1. No, and 2. No.

Yoda:

19-12-2008 15:40:20 UTC

Why not?  Doesn’t a negative negate a positive in case of a contradiction?

Rodlen:

19-12-2008 15:47:25 UTC

I think it is dynastic rules override core rules.

arthexis: he/him

19-12-2008 15:53:34 UTC

I think it was Specific beats General.

Yoda:

19-12-2008 16:32:41 UTC

I think it is arthexis beats Rodlen.  Lol.

Yoda:

19-12-2008 16:33:30 UTC

But the name should still be the Fourth Metadynasty because there is nothing that says this shall be called the First Metadynasty of Rodlen.