Thursday, September 04, 2025

Proposal: Overworked and Underappreciated

If “Everyone remember your goals and objectives” was not enacted, enact it.

In the rule “Employees”, replace “Each Innie has a Stress, which is an integer of 0 or higher, defaulting to 2.” with the following:

Each Innie has a Stress, privately tracked by the Board, which is an integer of 0 or higher and defaults to 2. At any time, an Innie may privately request the current value of their Stress from the Board, and the Board should privately reply with that Innie’s Stress (at the time of the reply) at their earliest convenience. Whenever an Innie’s Stress changes, the Board should privately inform that Innie of their Stress at their earliest convenience.

In the same rule, replace “Each Innie has a Work Ethic” with “Each Innie has a publicly-tracked Work Ethic”.

It might be more interesting if Stress is private, so that other Innies don’t know how Stressed their coworkers are.

Comments

SingularByte: he/him

04-09-2025 16:34:16 UTC

So the tricky part about prviate stress is that it will both be very visible in places (if the emperor has to decrease someone’s worth ethic according to their current stress), while also leaving the work ethic more likely to be wrong (if regular players can’t directly check whether it’s valid).

As a side effect, this means that Star Employee, Slacker and the department counterparts are impossible to judge by non-emperors.

It’s not necessarily going to mean stress has to be public, but that some more of my rule might need reworking to cope.

JonathanDark: he/him

04-09-2025 16:38:26 UTC

That’s fair. We don’t yet know what actions will adjust Stress. My anticipation is that the Board will be involved and will thus keep Work Ethic accurate, but I could be wrong.

I’m happy to either see this evolve, or if it is obvious that it will become too cumbersome, make Stress publicly tracked. I just wanted to see if it was worth considering.

Chiiika: she/her

04-09-2025 17:07:23 UTC

I would default to reducing their load; so I don’t think it is a good idea.  against

SingularByte: he/him

04-09-2025 17:12:21 UTC

imperial  I am fine with the idea in principle, but I’ll def since it’s not my call whether it’s too high a workload or not.

JonathanDark: he/him

04-09-2025 17:25:00 UTC

Good point, I’ll imperial as well, let eternalservererror make the call.

Chiiika: she/her

04-09-2025 17:41:40 UTC

imperial cov

Kevan: he/him

04-09-2025 17:46:03 UTC

imperial

You must be logged in as a player to post comments.