Sunday, February 15, 2015

Proposal: A reasonable limitation on our sabotage power [Demand]

Failed 1 vote to 6, number of Crewmembers who are not voting AGAINST it is less than Quorum. Failed by Kevan. Mediator gains 2 Clearance.

Adminned at 16 Feb 2015 20:31:14 UTC

Add after the first paragraph of the rule “Sabotage”

If the Proposal being Sabotaged would affect only the Core Rules and/or the Glossary, or if the Proposal was created by the Ship’s Computer, the Ship’s Computer may choose not to veto it, instead posting a comment stating that a sabotage attempt was overridden by emergency subroutines.

Add this paragraph to the end of the rule “Missions”

The next time the Ship’s Computer would Alert the crew to a new Pending Mission, they shall first privately select a random non-Disabled Human Crewmember, using a randomizing method of their choice, and give that Crewmember the Condition Disabled. They shall then repeal this paragraph from the Ruleset.

Comments

Bucky: Proprietor

15-02-2015 23:40:59 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

16-02-2015 05:40:09 UTC

against

Sylphrena:

16-02-2015 07:19:37 UTC

against

ais523:

16-02-2015 17:17:31 UTC

imperial because if Josh falls for this trick again, it’ll be hilarious.

Josh: he/him

16-02-2015 18:17:49 UTC

against Not so much unaware of the trick, more just don’t care about it - long since decided not to let Mediator effects change the way I vote.

Brendan: he/him

16-02-2015 18:39:29 UTC

imperial Because the best decision is to take odds on whether this hits someone with lower Clearance than me, right, ais?

_Fox_:

16-02-2015 18:40:13 UTC

ais523, are you in an alliance with Josh? He is quickly going to surpass the other Androids in clearance.

ais523:

16-02-2015 18:50:56 UTC

I’ll explain by PM.

ais523:

16-02-2015 20:24:39 UTC

By the way, this proposal can be adminned now: 6 AGAINSTs and 11 players (DEFERENTIAL on a Demand copies the Mediator, not Kevan). Please would an admin do so?