Thursday, October 08, 2009

Proposal: Adding structure to the Points system

Passes with Quorum FOR (12-0). -Bucky
This proposal will already be enacted before this is required, but for clarity’s sake:
+10 Score for arthexis

Adminned at 08 Oct 2009 12:58:23 UTC

If proposal “Back to the Basics again” failed, this proposal does nothing.

Add a sub-rule called “Leader board” under rule “Points”:

The Player with the highest Score amongst all Players is the Master. If two or more players are tied for the highest Score, no Player is the Master.

Add a sub-rule called “Accountability” under rule “Points”:

Whenever a Proposal is enacted or failed, if such an action would cause any player’s Score to be modified, the Admin who enacted it or failed it must explain on their Admin comment for that proposal all the appropriate Score modifications that are to take place due to that action.

Whenever a rule indicates that a Player’s Score is modified, any Player may carry out the adjustment in the GNDT, provided the adjustment is carried out only once. This rule supersedes every other rule that specifies who can modify a Player’s Score.

 

First: To create a term to distinguish who is currently winning. No benefits for being the Master yet, though I think it will probably be a double edged sword.

Second: The Admin can, instead of having to go and modify the GNDT, simply list the score changes (in case they get too tiresome or complex), for example “Darknight +10”. Then, anybody can make the adjustments. After all, if a player gains points, it’s in that player’s best judgement to claim them, and when they lose them, their enemies will stand up to do the work. I don’t think we need a time limit either, just let everything flow at the player’s rhythm.

Comments

Bucky:

10-08-2009 02:42:47 UTC

for

Darknight:

10-08-2009 03:15:23 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

10-08-2009 03:25:05 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

10-08-2009 03:31:00 UTC

for Just semantics, but I’d prefer a word besides Master. Since we already did “Leader” recently, how about “Number 1”?

arthexis:

10-08-2009 03:43:07 UTC

I have no particular attachment to the word “Master”. Perhaps we should make a contest or so to change it? Or maybe the person that gets it can change it to whatever they want? We can think of something.

Excalabur:

10-08-2009 04:18:49 UTC

for

Kevan:

10-08-2009 10:34:30 UTC

for

ais523:

10-08-2009 13:10:19 UTC

for

Klisz:

10-08-2009 14:07:57 UTC

for

Wooble:

10-08-2009 14:54:29 UTC

for

Amnistar:

10-08-2009 17:24:05 UTC

for

Shem:

10-08-2009 17:45:10 UTC

for