Saturday, March 11, 2006

Proposal: Concern about concern about concerns mk.II

Timed out, reached quorum, whatever.  12-1.—Shadowclaw

Adminned at 14 Mar 2006 06:29:29 UTC

Create a column in the GNDT, “Stigma”.
Set everyone’s Stigma to 0.

Change “Dosh Production Groups” in the first clause of “Dosh Concern” to “Dosh Production Groups, or DPGs”

Add a subrule to “Dosh Concern”, “Group Voting”:

If a post requires a Group Vote from a DPG, members of that DPG may vote either FOR or AGAINST the post.  If, after 24 hours, the post has more FOR votes from Gostaks belonging to the DPG than AGAINST votes from Gostaks belonging to the DPG, and has at least 2 FOR votes, the post is said to pass the Group Vote from the DPG.

Replace

If a Gostak does not belong to a Dosh Production Group, e may roll DICE4 and join the Dosh Production Group with that number.  If a Gostak wishes to change eir Dosh Production Group, e must make an official post declaring e wishes to do so, and may switch only after that post recieves more FOR votes than AGAINST votes from the members of that Dosh Production Group after 24 hours.

in the rule “Dosh Concerns” with

A Gostak may leave the DPG e belongs to at any time e wishes.
When a Gostak leaves a DPG, eir Stigma increases by 1.

If a Gostak wishes to belong to a Dosh Production Group that 2 or more Gostaks belong to, e must make an official post declaring e wishes to do so, and may belong to that DPG only after that post passes a Group Vote from the DPG e wishes to belong to.

A Gostak may join a DPG that 0 or 1 Gostaks belong to at any time.

Add a subrule to “Dosh Concern”, “Group Abilities”:

A DPG may give any amount of its Dosh to any other DPG if a Gostak makes a post suggesting the donation and that post passes a Group Vote from the DPG that would lose Dosh in the transaction.

Add a subrule to “Dosh Concern”, “Titles”:

* If there is a Gostak who has more Distimmed Dosh than any other Gostak in the DPG e belongs to, and e belongs to a DPG, e is the Daleph of the DPG e belongs to.

* Each DPG may have an Avzur.  At any time, any Gostak may make an official post nominating an Avzur for the DPG the nominee belongs to.  If that post passes a Group Vote from the DPG the nominee belongs to, the nominee becomes Avzur of that DPG.  If there is already an Avzur of that DPG, e is no longer Avzur.

All DPGs start with no Avzur.

No longer are DPGs mandatory, nor are they necessarily random, plus 0-2 titles per group.  Names courtesy of http://lars.atomica.be/syl.php

posted by 90000 at 11 Mar 2006 23:22:30 UTC Comments (13)

Comments

Hix:

12-03-2006 00:36:48 UTC

against

Shadowclaw:

12-03-2006 00:57:12 UTC

against

Bucky:

12-03-2006 03:32:13 UTC

for , but I think the groups themselves should define “Avzur” and “Daleph.

Scaramouche:

12-03-2006 04:41:53 UTC

for

Rodney:

12-03-2006 16:34:07 UTC

for

90000:

12-03-2006 17:32:50 UTC

for See, the problem with letting groups define things is that the first member of First Gostak could call himself the Avzur and say an Avzur can declare victory at any time.

Shadowclaw:

12-03-2006 19:55:35 UTC

for CoV

smith:

13-03-2006 14:38:11 UTC

for

predisastered:

13-03-2006 16:43:21 UTC

for

Elias IX:

13-03-2006 19:23:42 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

13-03-2006 21:01:56 UTC

for

Angry Grasshopper:

13-03-2006 22:39:23 UTC

Interesting.

for

Igthorn:

14-03-2006 08:00:35 UTC

for