Thursday, October 22, 2009

Proposal: Plus-10 for a blank proposal?

Passes 7-3 with 3 trivials.  +10 points to Bucky. -Bucky

Adminned at 24 Oct 2009 16:53:54 UTC

In the Rule entitled “Trivial Proposals”, change the text

it contains a statement to that effect, its title contains the text “[Trivial]” or at least half of the EVCs on that proposal contain the text “Trivial”

to

it contains a statement to that effect, its title contains the text “[Trivial]”, at least half of the EVCs on that proposal contain the text “Trivial” or it has no effect on the Ruleset upon enactment

In the Rule entitled “Team Rules”, change the text

Whenever a new rule is created

to

Whenever a new Dynastic rule is created

The glossary reform proposal had to be carefully worded so that I wouldn’t end up owning the glossary.  Also, auto-trivializing any proposal that doesn’t change the rules.

Comments

Klisz:

10-22-2009 21:53:11 UTC

for

arthexis:

10-22-2009 22:34:02 UTC

against

Kevan:

10-22-2009 23:08:16 UTC

for Trivial!

ais523:

10-22-2009 23:13:22 UTC

against because it might change the gamestate.

ais523:

10-22-2009 23:20:25 UTC

As in, a proposal might change the gamestate but not the ruleset.

Kevan:

10-22-2009 23:38:50 UTC

A proposal that only changed the gamestate would be quite trivial.

Bucky:

10-23-2009 00:04:12 UTC

@ais:The original draft said ‘ruleset or gamestate’.  The trivialization of gamestate-only proposals is intentional.

Ienpw III:

10-23-2009 00:17:25 UTC

for Trivial

arthexis:

10-23-2009 00:26:50 UTC

CoV for Trivial.

Klisz:

10-23-2009 00:30:43 UTC

CoV against  per ais.

Qwazukee:

10-23-2009 06:31:03 UTC

against Trivial

Oze:

10-23-2009 07:18:07 UTC

for

Wooble:

10-23-2009 15:11:42 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

10-23-2009 16:54:02 UTC

for Expressly not tr1v1a1