Friday, April 12, 2024

Story Post: Snap 029: Chalk

Comments

JonathanDark: he/him

12-04-2024 14:49:33 UTC

This satisfies all of my Private Criteria, but I do not find it aesthetically pleasing.

Kevan: City he/him

12-04-2024 15:15:44 UTC

Raising a small flag on the fact that one of your since-declared Criteria was “The shot contains paper”, but this is a piece of corrugated cardboard.

JonathanDark: he/him

12-04-2024 15:27:54 UTC

Indeed it is. I’ve already changed my Criteria, so how should I go back and restate what it satisfied at the time? I can’t now declare what it satisfies against my new Criteria because my criteria has now changed since the shot was posted. Is it sufficient to simply correct the gamestate regarding the related Award claim?

I’ll deal with the Award claim on that post.

Kevan: City he/him

12-04-2024 16:30:46 UTC

That seems the way to go.

This matches my 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th criteria but not my 5th. I find the gradation from grey soil to white chalk, with shadows being part of that, aesthetically pleasing.

Josh: he/they

12-04-2024 17:55:05 UTC

This meets none of my eligible criteria, and I don’t find it aesthetically pleasing - while the top-heavy composition has a certain symmetry I ultimately find the subject matter not to be stirring.

NadNavillus: he/him

12-04-2024 17:55:56 UTC

[T, T, F, F, F] = Score +7

I find this aesthetically pleasing = Kevan Score +2