S-K. Was ~1-9 against. —Excalabur
Adminned at 01 Feb 2007 00:37:02 UTC
Add this to the second bulleted list in Rule 1.5:
- The Olympian who proposed it has been Banned from the game.
Pie-is-square’s proposal, Help for younger olympians, is piling up since it is overwhelmingly Against, but cannot be failed because there is not quorum.
Quorum is 10, as of this comment there are 9 no votes on that proposal. There isn’t a crisis here of such a magnitude that a Rule 1.X should be amended.
spikebrennan is right. Pie-is-square’s proposal does no harm right now. Any future such proposal can wait the 48 hours. Its not like it will be common that a person makes a proposal, gets banned before than proposal runs out. Not to mention people might *want* the banned proposal to pass. But yeah, there is no point to this.
that’s the first person we’ve had to ban in the existence of blognomic—something like four years now.
so this doesn’t strike me as neccessary.
Maybe it’s not necessary per se, but I still think it’s a good idea.
We have no official method for banning, and this will just leave an undefined term in the ruleset.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
peacefulwarrior: