Welcome to BlogNomic, a self-modifying game where changing the rules is a move. Players make blog posts proposing alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.

The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history, or join our Discord. New players are always welcome to join the game at any time.

Story Post: New Acronym: K_E_V_A_N (0 comments) Prompt: Historical Event

Prompt: Historical Event

Friday, July 18, 2025

Story Post: Killing Erupts Violently in Autocratic Nation-state

18 May 1980
Gwangju, South Korea — A series of student-led demonstrations has just erupted against the military dictator Chun Doo-hwan. The ROK is actively suppressing the protests, and has been firing on the students. At least 165 people are confirmed dead, with the death toll rising every hour.

Proposal: Less Repetitive Names Acrotype

In the rule “Acronym”, change

In that set, remove the name of the Wordsmith selected in the most Acrogenerate action performed with an Acrotype of “Names”, if there was such an action

to

From that set, remove the names of the last four Wordsmiths selected in Acrogenerate actions performed with an Acrotype of “Names”, or those in as many as exist if there are fewer than four such actions

Story Post: Kiev Encirclement Victory Achieved for Nazis

The Battle of Kiev (1941) was a major Axis victory in which a large Soviet force was encircled near Kiev and subsequently dealt very heavy damage to. It isn’t pretty history but it did happen.

Friday, July 18, 2025

Story Post: Kepler’s Exoplanetary Validation and Announcement News

In 2014, NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope confirmed Kepler-186f to be the first Earth size exoplanet discovered in the habitable zone of another star. Kepler-186f was discovered orbiting a red dwarf star about 500 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Cygnus.

Proposal: Kicked Entity Vitiated Affiliation. Normalize.

Reached quorum 5 votes to 3. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 19 Jul 2025 08:11:25 UTC

Repeal the rule “The Sports Field”.

This is over. No need to leave extra scars.

Proposal: Kept Elicited Values Anchored at Newtides

Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST. Failed 3 votes to 6 by Kevan.

Adminned at 19 Jul 2025 08:10:41 UTC

Rewrite The Sports Field into

The idle Wordsmith DeactivatedUser4498 formerly known as Raven1207 may not be made unidle in the Sixth Dynasty of JonathanDark.

two reasons
1: for any future viewers of this ruleset; i think this is something we chose as a collective and should be recorded as such
2: for bureaucracy and functionality of the rules given Raven1207 does not exist as a referrable user.

Call for Judgment: Knowing Each Variance of Ascension Nits

Popular, 6-0. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 17 Jul 2025 21:44:00 UTC

Uphold the Dynastic Reset performed on 17:24, June 19, 2025 as legal.

In the rule “Ruleset and Gamestate”, replace the text “The gamestate tracking page for this dynasty is the [[Drafting Board]] page of the wiki” with “The gamestate tracking page for this dynasty is the [[Acronymbus]] page of the wiki”

One of the steps in the Dynastic Reset is “Update the gamestate tracking page referred to in the rule “Ruleset and Gamestate” with the name specified in the most recent Ascension Address” and it looks like that step wasn’t done for this dynasty or the previous one. Since DoVs uphold actions in their respective dynasties, we just need to uphold the latest Dynastic Reset and fix it.

Story Post: Kleptocrats Ensnare Venezuela’s Asamblea Nationale

The December 1999 rewrite of Venezuela’s constitution replaced the bicameral legislature with a unified one called the Asamblea Nationale. Due in part to an opposition party boycott, on July 30, 2000, the Fifth Republic Movement took a majority of the seats. They used their newly unchecked power to revoke the autonomy of state-owned oil company PDVSA, and seized enough of its revenue to pay their political allies that it became financially unsound despite its legal privileges. Their ability to direct oil revenue to buy votes allowed them to maintain long-term power and to nationalize and plunder most of Venezuela’s large industrial enterprises .

Proposal: Key an Economised Variety of All Numbers

Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST. Failed at 1 FOR, 1 AGA, 3 REVISE, by kevan.

Adminned at 19 Jul 2025 08:10:05 UTC

To the rule “Scoring”, add a paragraph:-

A Wordsmith’s Pool is made up of, for the most recent Scorings they have made on each Backronym that was posted since the last time an Acrogenerate action was performed, the number X in each Scoring’s “Score X”. If a Wordsmith’s Pool contains at least four different numbers (or no repeated numbers at all), then that Wordsmith is considered Balanced, otherwise they are considered Askew.

Then replace “For each Wordsmith that posted a Scoring to that Backronym” with:-

For each Balanced Wordsmith that posted a Scoring to that Backronym

Replace “A Scoring should reflect how much the commenter likes the Backronym, and how well they think it fits the Prompt (if the Prompt is not blank). ” with:-

A Scoring should reflect how much the commenter likes the Backronym, how well they think it fits the Prompt (if the Prompt is not blank), and any attempt they wish to make to spread the numbers in their Pool.

The Pool proposal revised as requested: only four numbers, and more thoughtful reflection.

I’ll omit the one-round delay since we’ve just started this one.

Call for Judgment: Deactivation

Reached quorum 5 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 17 Jul 2025 20:49:04 UTC

Rename the player who holds account #4498 to “DeactivatedUser4498”.

This is a player who asked me to deactivate their account today, and who has just been idled. Their username can only be changed through the rules of the game, so it must go to a vote.

Renaming the account will change the name given on all of this user’s past posts and comments.

Story Post: Korea Exchanges Volunteer Army Nationals

Prisoners on both sides of the Korean War were exchanged at Panmunjom in 1953, following the signing of the Korean Armistice Agreement. Members of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, deployed by Mao as the “Volunteer Army” to avoid any complications of a direct war with the United States, were among those exchanged.”

Story Post: Khrushchev Enjoys Volatile Accomplished Notoriety

Nikita Khrushchev led the Soviet Union from 1953 to 1964 and gained much popularity from sponsoring the Russian space program, most notably the launch of the first satellite Sputnik. His popularity went into decline after the failure of his domestic policies and the aftermath of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Story Post: Kennedy Emerges Victorious Atop Nixon

JFK defeats Richard Nixon in the 1960 United States presidential election, becoming the youngest president ever.

Story Post: Königsberg Electorate Votes for Agrarian Nationalism

In the 1933 elections the German region of Königsberg voted 54% for the National Socialist party. The East Prussian capital became known as ‘Hitler’s Fortress City’ and as such came under heavy attack from the British air force and the Soviet army at the end of the war. The book ‘German Blood, Slavic Soil’ illustrates how the Nazis adapted their message to a particularly agrarian-populist variant of their ideology in order to win over the rural electorate, and how this led to problems later when the underlying ethno-nationalist policies of the Reich resulted in a need to separate Germans, Poles, and Lithuanians in order to put their ethnic cleansing into practice.

Proposal: Kindling Engagement in Various Ancillary Notations

Withdrawn. Josh

Adminned at 17 Jul 2025 19:54:34 UTC

Remove the following from the bulleted list in the rule Favorites:

The first letter of that word is not one of the letters in the current Acronym

Add the following as a second-to-last paragraph in the same rule:

A Wordsmith may not add a word to their Favorites if the first letter of that word is one of the letters in the current Acronym, unless they spend a Coin to do so.

In the following bullet point in the rule Scoring, change the number “1” to “3”:

For each Wordsmith who is not the author of that Backronym, for each Favorable word in that Wordsmith’s Favorites that matched a word in the title of that Backronym, add 1 to that Wordsmith’s Points and remove that word from that Wordsmith’s Favorites.

 

I haven’t managed to latch on to a good use for the Favourites mechanic yet. I might be alone in this, but it feels like a huge shot in the dark. A bit like the Coins mechanic, I’m exploring whether it can be made into something more interesting.

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Proposal: The direct approach

Reached quorum 7 votes to 1 AGA, 1 REVISE. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 17 Jul 2025 18:17:21 UTC

Make the Wordsmith called Raven1207 idle. Add the following as a new dynastic rule, called The Sports Field:

The idle Wordsmith Raven1207 may not be made unidle in the Sixth Dynasty of JonathanDark.

This feels a little icky, and I’m going to weigh up shifting to authoral DEF on it, but we’ve had a bit too much discourse in this dynasty about how to manage players who are barely active, so it is time to at least test the marker of more extreme sanctions.

To recap: Raven has been submitting nonsense Backronyms for the last few rounds, and has largely made their Scoring contributions blindly, with all Backronyms getting the same score and the same comment. There is little evidence that he is engaging with the subject matter of proposals when voting on them, and he is not making proposals of his own. In all senses, his approach to the game is minimum-viable; not really playing, but still present.

Is this important? Maybe. In a normal dynasty, it would be annoying. Barely-present players do harm the game. This is explored in various essays; I’ll not reproduce the argument here. But in this dynasty it has a greater effect in perverting outcomes. By increasing the top end of the scoring range, it contributes to a flattening of scores such that front-runners become much harder to catch. It prevents posts that would be flops from being flops. It creates a predictable field in which to farm for favourites. In short: it changes what should be a fair game into one in which exploiting the actions of the rogue player becomes a mechanic. This is not a hard dynasty; the rules are not ornate. Playing the game in its intended spirit is not a heavy lift.

At a certain point, we are not being asked to respect a playstyle, so much as we are asking to chose between them. The imbalanced field is pushing away good players. It is encouraging games that can bear being disrupted by players who aren’t really playing and don’t really care. Do we want BlogNomic to be a game where wide-ranging, free-wheeling, creative thinkers come to test the boundaries of play with other people who will challenge and inspire them? Or do we want it to be an insipid vehicle that carries the disiniterested and listless? It is becoming more and more the case that those are contradictory positions. If we want the game to be one thing or another then we need to assert some principles. Today, the principle that I want to defend is that that we would prefer that players only play when they can offer their focus and commitment.

This point has been made before. It has been made in such a way that allowed other players to recognise and remedy their own approaches to the game. Raven has persistently refused to take accountability for their impact on the game. It is time that we at least considered enforcing the kinds of standards of play that we want to see in the game.

Needless to say, if Raven’s vote on this proposal contains a commitment to play the game properly then I’ll withdraw the proposal.

Proposal: Greg Davies’ Eyebrows

Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST/REVISE. Failed 1 vote to 6 by Kevan.

Adminned at 17 Jul 2025 16:13:28 UTC

To the rule “Scoring”, add two paragraphs:-

A Wordsmith’s Pool is made up of the most recent Scorings they have made on each Backronym that was posted since the last time an Acrogenerate action was performed. If a Wordsmith’s Pool contains five different numbers (or no repeated numbers), then that Wordsmith is considered Balanced, otherwise they are considered Askew.

(If the current Acronym is DARKENED then all Wordsmiths are considered Balanced; this overrides the previous paragraph. Any Wordsmith may repeal this paragraph if the current Acronym is not DARKENED.)

Then replace “For each Wordsmith that posted a Scoring to that Backronym” with:-

For each Balanced Wordsmith that posted a Scoring to that Backronym

Requiring players to spread their scores across the range 1 through 5, in order for those ratings to be counted.

Proposal: Teraflop

Reached quorum 6 votes to 1. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 17 Jul 2025 10:56:29 UTC

In “Scoring”, replace “considered a Flop and any later steps in this action that would award Points to the Backronym’s author are skipped” with:-

considered a Flop and any later steps in this action that would award Points to any Wordsmith are skipped

Flops probably shouldn’t score for anyone. If I openly ask another player to include a couple of words in their Backronym because they’re my Favorites, and they obligingly do so, the group should have the option to stop that from paying out to me by voting it down.

Proposal: Favorite Coin

Withdrawn. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:42:12 UTC

In the rule “Scoring”, change

add 1 to that Wordsmith’s Points and remove that word from that Wordsmith’s Favorites.

to

for each word in that Wordsmith’s Favorites that matched a word in the title of that Backronym, add 1 each to that Wordsmith’s Points and Coins and remove that word from that Wordsmith’s Favorites.

Add the following text to the end of the rule Favorites:

A Wordsmith may spend 1 Coin to remove one of their own Favorites, specifying which Favorite in the wiki update that spends the coin.

Tying coins to Favorites, both making the rewards for Favorite matching and Buzzword covering distinct, and letting good Favorites pay for the removal of bad ones at the cost of disclosing what they were.

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Dumb Admin Robbed Karma Editing New Entries Distractedly

I’m the dumb admin in this case. Please ignore my recent comments on the Open Backronyms and do your best to Score the remaining Backronyms without looking at my comments, or if it’s too late, try to ignore my comments. I started processing the Backronyms too early. Per the rules:

If the Acronym is Secret, then an Open Backronym can only be resolved if every Open Backronym was either posted at least 48 hours ago, or has a Scoring posted to it from every active Wordsmith other than its author.

Key phrase being “every Open Backronym”.

Proposal: Casting Off the Lead Weights

Unpopular, 1-6 with 2 DEFs and Puzzler voting FOR. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:41:23 UTC

If “Discount All Ravenlike Karma; Enough Numbers for Equitable Debut” was not enacted, in the rule “Acronym”, insert the following paragraph just after the text “The Puzzler may Acrogenerate if the Acronym is empty.”

If only one Wordsmith has a Points score which is less than half of the mean Points score of the group, they are the Straggler.

In the rule “Acronym”, replace “every Wordsmith has posted a Backronym” with “every Wordsmith (not including the Straggler, if there is one) has posted a Backronym”

If there is a Straggler who is not intending on trying to gain any more Points from posting a Backronym, we need not wait on them.

Story Post: Determination Anchors Resolve, Kindling Every Necessary Enduring Dream

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 18:01:37 UTC

A older native saying, to help those with doubt find the confidence to strive for their goals

Proposal: Declaration Against Receiving Knowledge Employing Neuronic Electronic Devices

revise withdrawn - chiiika.

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 11:19:36 UTC

To the end of “Backronym”, add a paragraph:-

Wordsmiths are asked to avoid using chatbots and other large-language models to generate Backronyms or other text for the game, during this dynasty, and should declare if they have done this while this sentence was present in the ruleset.

adding this back now that my slots are open for stuff like these

Story Post: Donuts Always Return Killjoy Effects, a Needless Example Diabetes

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:59:16 UTC

While fine in moderation, you really gotta watch those sugary treats!

Proposal: Refavouring

Reached quorum 6 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 10:56:14 UTC

Apply the ruleset and gamestate changes proposed by More Feared, More Favoured, then replace “If a Wordsmith’s Favorites include any words which are not Favorable” with:-

If a Wordsmith’s Favorites include any words which match a word in the Word Bank, or which match a Filler Word,

Apply the ruleset changes proposed in Axiom Regarding Intelligent Artifice.

Reapplying a proposal I withdrew just now because it still had a bug in it (it would have requested the reset of Favorites that matched active Acronym letters), and we may as well put the AI paragraph in (which was quorate a couple of days ago but I withdrew it because I needed the slot back).

Proposal: Discount All Ravenlike Karma; Enough Numbers for Equitable Debut

Reached quorum 7 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 07:44:20 UTC

In “Scoring”, replace “defaults to the second lowest number of points held by another Wordsmith other than the Puzzler.” with:-

defaults to the lowest number of points held by another Wordsmith (excluding the Puzzler and the Straggler, where they exist). If only one Wordsmith has a Points score which is less than half of the mean Points score of the group, they are the Straggler.

On the Discord on Saturday Raven cited this “second-lowest” rule as being a part of their decision to to stick around scoring everyone at five, and said that they could make a proposal later that day to amend the rule, but didn’t.

Not sure how best to draw the line. Putting it at less than half of mean Points (currently 22.5) will at present cut out Raven, and keep Trapdoorspyder in the pack if Raven were to idle.

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Story Post: Don’t Anger a Raging King and Ensue Necessitated Everlasting Death

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:56:52 UTC

Angering kings is usually not a good idea if you want to stay alive.

Proposal: Don’t Archive Redundant Kinds of Endless Nostalgic Edicts: a Deprecation

popular 8-0 enacted, chiiika.

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 06:23:20 UTC

Under the rule “Scoring”, remove the text “(if the current Acronym is not RRBM) “.

Now that the acronym is not RRBM, it is redundant and clutters up the rules unnecessarily. Also, under the highly unlikely circumstances that the acronym *does* become RRBM again, it won’t trigger the exception.

Story Post: Drunks Aren’t Remembered Kindly for Eating Nearly Every Doughnut

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:55:50 UTC

Behave yourself when drinking. You might not remember everything that you do but others will.

Story Post: Doofenshmirtz Asked, “Richard Kingsley, Ever Negotiate Edible Dirt?”

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:54:43 UTC

Bizarre quote from a lost Phineas and Ferb episode

Story Post: Deprecation Addicts Reprocess the Knocks; Empowered Notables Eschew Deprecation

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:54:04 UTC

This saying mean that if you want to get famous, you shouldn’t dwell on past failures, whether your own or others’ at your expense.

Proposal: Defining Arbitrage Rewards Knowledge, Ends the Nuisance of Empty Design

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 06:21:45 UTC

Rename the rule Savings to Wagers. Change its text to read as follows:

Each Wordsmith has a publicly tracked number of Coins, defaulting to 0.

Each Wordsmith has a Wager, privately tracked by the Puzzler, which can be either a number between 0 to 5 inclusive or a null value, and which defaults to a null value.

If a Wordsmith has not posted a Backronym since the most recent Acrogenerate, as a Virtual Action they may set their Wager to a valid value.

In the rule Scoring, change the following two bullet points:

Subtract the Savings of the author of that Backronym from that author’s Points, to a minimum of 0 Points, then set that author’s Savings to 0.
Take the difference of that author’s Points before the previous step and after the previous step and add that difference to that author’s Coins.

to read:

If the author of the Backronym’s Wager has the exact same value as the Points they gained from that Backronym then they also gain Coins equal to the same amount. Otherwise they lose one Coin, to a minimum of zero coins.

unpopular @ 3-6; chiiika.

Proposal: More Feared, More Favoured

Withdrawn. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 15 Jul 2025 08:36:58 UTC

In “Favorites”, replace “as long as each of the words added to their Favorites meet all of the following criteria” with:-

as long as each of the words added to their Favorites is Favorable. A word is Favorable if and only if it meets all of the following criteria:

In “Scoring”, replace “for each word in that Wordsmith’s Favorites” with:-

for each Favorable word in that Wordsmith’s Favorites

In “Favorites”, add a paragraph to the end:-

If a Wordsmith’s Favorites include any words which are not Favorable, the Puzzler should remove those words from those Favorites, and privately inform the Wordsmith that this has happened.

For each case where a Wordsmith gained a Point from a Favorite which matched a word which was in the Word Bank at the time, or which matched a Filler Word, remove those Points.

Reproposing Fear of Favour with a fix to the final point-removing clause.

Monday, July 14, 2025

Proposal: Does Anyone Respect Known Endings? No Exit Drama.

Popular 5-0 with 4 DEFs and Puzzler voting FOR. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 15 Jul 2025 03:31:41 UTC

Add the following text to the end of the rule “The Threshold” as a new paragraph:

The body of the Ascension Address should contain its author’s Backronym for the Endgame Acronym, if it exists.

Story Post: Don’t Advance Recklessly Knowing Enemies Nearby Earnestly Defend

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:53:18 UTC

It was a simplistic saying in the military, told from every Commander to their Lieutenants, but it held a purpose. No one wanted a repeat of the incident where a young upstart led his regiment in a charge up a hill, completely overconfident of overwhelming the enemy forces dug in on the other side. There was barely anyone alive who fought on the attacking side that day.

Story Post: Don’t Ask for Refunds, Keep Every Nickel and Every Dime

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:52:37 UTC

Old folks where I grew up always said that if you weren’t sure about a purchase, it was better to save your money and not buy it at all than to rely on a shop’s refund policy. The customer service industry has advanced since then, but I still find it to be good advice.

Story Post: Dirt Ain’t Raised Kicking Eagle Nests or Earthworm Dung

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:51:39 UTC

An old Tennessee proverb about ensuring that your effort is put to actions that meet your objectives

Story Post: Descriptions Are Rope, for Keeping Entitled Nagging Editors Delighted

Adminned at 16 Jul 2025 17:50:36 UTC

scribbled on the draft that is mistakenly sent to the editor instead of a friend.

Story Post: New Acronym: D_A_R_K_E_N_E_D

Prompt: Popular Saying or Quote

Proposal: Fear of Favour

Withdrawn. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 14 Jul 2025 07:18:32 UTC

In “Favorites”, replace “as long as each of the words added to their Favorites meet all of the following criteria” with:-

as long as each of the words added to their Favorites is Favorable. A word is Favorable if and only if it meets all of the following criteria:

In “Scoring”, replace “for each word in that Wordsmith’s Favorites” with:-

for each Favorable word in that Wordsmith’s Favorites

In “Favorites”, add a paragraph to the end:-

If a Wordsmith’s Favorites include any words which are not Favorable, the Puzzler should remove those words from those Favorites, and privately inform the Wordsmith that this has happened.

For each Wordsmith who has gained Points (on a Backronym for the ARIA Acronym) from Favorites which would not be considered Favorable under this rule as amended, remove those Points.

Missed my chance to get in on this loophole, so I’ll call it out instead: it’s no longer legal to set a Favorite of “ins” or “anded” and score for those filler words, but it looks like it is legal to still have one that you set before that recent rule change was proposed, or while it was pending.