Reaches antiquorum. Josh
Adminned at 17 Aug 2011 07:17:22 UTC
Coppro took a selective reading of the rule on Following Through. There were two ambiguities that he exploited:
* While the rule specifies that Following Through may be performed under certain circumstances, it doesn’t forbid performing it without those circumstances existing; and
* “provided that it continues in the same direction of travel as the initial shove” refers to the very first shove performed in the game, rather than the shove that resulted in the follow through taking place.
The latter only appears to be justifiable in the context of the former - if following through requires a shove then it is clear that that is the shove referred to by the term “initial”, and if it does not then it can be reasonably asserted that “initial” refers to the first shove ever performed. I find the first to be dubious, however, on the grounds that the ruleset never explicitly states that main actions can be performed *at all*, so the redacto ad absurdum approach still prevents Coppro from taking those actions.
Therefore, revert Coppro’s actions as undertaken on August 15th and add one Foul to his total.